On 25 August 2010 09:34, Alex Smith <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > --- On Tue, 24/8/10, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >> OIC. >> >> Proposal: Mother says not to run on the concrete >> (AI = 3, II = 1, co-author = omd, distributable via fee) >> >> Amend Rule 106 (Adopting Proposals) by replacing this >> text: >> >> If the Rules do not otherwise permit at least one current active >> player to distribute a Proposal, then any player may do so >> Without 3 Objections. >> >> with this text: >> >> If there is a Proposal in the Pool that it would otherwise be >> IMPOSSIBLE for any active player to distribute, then any player >> CAN distribute that Proposal Without 3 Objections. > > Dangerous; the rule currently exists as a safety valve, and it's less of a > safety valve in the new version should the pool ever be broken. > > A more sensible fix would be to make it without-1-objection, and to make it > illegal to do so if there would be a better way to make the proposal work (in > some more defined sense than just "better"). > > -- > ais523 "Doing so is illegal if there is another possible combination of player actions not involving this rule that would cause the proposal to be distributed within a week"?
-- -Tiger
