On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > CFJ, disqualifying omd: In the section of Rule 106 quoted in caller's > evidence, "permit" should be interpreted as referring to possibility > and not legality.
I never said it referred to legality. The proposal I attempted to distribute was not in the Proposal Pool, so the Promotor could not distribute it.
