On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 9:23 AM, ais523 <callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > I'm also not convinced that just putting "distributable" in as a switch > value counts as flipping the switch to distributable by announcement > (possible for an II-0 proposal), especially when a similar format has > been used to make proposals distributable via rule 2284.
I've been treating these as effective. For interested proposals, this wording would fail as it doesn't announce that there is a fee associated with the action.
