comex wrote: > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 6:04 PM, comex <com...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Bribes are fun, but I didn't really want to scam an office I haven't >> even been keeping up with the reports of. > > As Sgeo just mentioned in ##nomic, I incorrectly awarded Champion to > inactive players, who since recently cannot win: > > Having been inactive within the past week is a Losing Condition.
I think the incorrect awards were ineffective, as no rule allowed you to make them. Contrast e.g. rotating the bench (Rule 1871), which the CotC always CAN do even if e violates the SHALL.
