On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > Gratuitous arguments: > 1. G.'s win announcements would have awarded wins in the order > Red players, Purple players, Green players, unrelated to > comex's ordering.
Oh, after rereading Rule 2188, you're right; it's clearly meant to apply to a specific (singular) proposal. It was my belief that due to the wording, the first announcement awarded a win to everyone, and the second two were ineffective.
