On Tue, 30 Mar 2010, Taral wrote: > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> No interpretation of Agoran law may limit the right of participation >> in the fora; therefore any interpretation of the law claiming that a >> forum G. could not reasonably access is a public forum is INVALID. > > Do we really want determinations of the validity of a forum to be ex post > facto?
Well, it's the validity of a specific set of messages sent to the forum, and we determine after the fact whether particular past messages were valid all the time. That's not to say it's the best solution. -G.
