On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > An attempt to performed a fee-based action is also implicitly a > claim to be in possession of sufficient ergs to perform the > action, and such a claim is self-ratifying. If the claim is > erroneous but self-ratifies, then the action is deemed to have > occurred and destroyed all ergs in the possession of the claimant.
Ah, that makes more sense now. > This rule defers to other Rules that > defined maximum voting limits. "define" -- -c.
