On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > CFJ: If the Chief Whip announced that 2 + 2 = 5, it would be legal > to publicly agree.
The hypothetical agreement occurs after the initiation of the case, so not a tortoise if judged UNDECIDABLE. Also, I believe IRRELEVANT is appropriate per the "overly hypothetical extrapolation" clause. -- -c.
