coppro wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Sean Hunt <ride...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote:
>>> (This goes back to September 21, the first full week in which the
>>> current "1 draw per interested case" clause was in effect. Â draws.php
>>> goes back 30 days from today's date. Â Side note: Â computing week-based
>>> cutoffs is more tedious than it should be.)
>>>
>>> Which would people prefer to see in the report?
>>>
>>>
>> It has to be less tedious than actually implementing history scanning
>> from scratch, which I should probably do if it looks like Amethyst
>> Card Repeal is going to pass.
>>
>> -coppro
>>
> 
> That should be if Amethyst Card Repeal is NOT going to pass.

To be more specific:  Each draws_by_week.php script works correctly, as
far as it goes.  What they is a "leave out data more than X weeks old"
cutoff; instead, they include every week from (hardcoded start date) to
(end of the most recent week that has already ended).  If you just go
by my published reports, then you can ignore this problem (I'll manually
trim the published list).

Reply via email to