On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > How would this draw a line between mousetraps and not-intended-as-scams > contract amendments that some parties don't like (e.g. W3O and only one > party objects)? In particular, consider what happens if Y agrees to > "X can act on behalf of Y to Z", then X scam-removes "to Z".
Contracts are usually either "agreements" between a small number of parties which don't need a nonconsensual amendment mechanism, or "subgames" which parties can leave by announcement. Contracts which really need to bind parties against their will into amendments can require an explicit waiver. -- -c.
