On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 00:50, Pavitra <celestialcognit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
>> This judge's opinion is that such a Hard Deregistration is exercised
>> by the player ceasing to be involved in the Agoran forums and
>> essentially ignoring the game. When such occurs, R101 vii is fulfilled
>> as Agora makes no attempt to impose any penalty upon a absent player
>> other than to deregister them.
>
> I pledge: {
> This pledge is named Acid Test.
> Pavitra SHALL NOT deregister.
> Pavitra CAN terminate this pledge by announcement.
> }
>
> I CFJ, II-2: {
> If Pavitra were to deregister now, explicitly invoking eir
> R101(vii) right, the only appropriate judgement in a criminal
> CFJ against em for violating the Power-2 R1742 by violating
> Acid Test by deregistering would be GUILTY/DISCHARGE.
> }
>
>
> Arguments:
>
> Judge BobTHJ's arguments in CFJ 2693 limit the R101 protection of the
> act of deregistration to the fact that "Agora makes no attempt to impose
> any penalty upon an absent player other than to deregister them." It
> follows that this fact should be maintained with extraordinary
> strictness, if R101(vii) is to have any meaning as a fundamental right.
> I strongly recommend TRUE.
>
Perhaps I wasn't clear enough with my arguments. Short of physically
hiring a police force (or bruiser) that physically travels to a former
player's home and beats the &$...@! out of them I don't think its
possible to infringe on a person's R101vii rights. Someone can
unsubscribe to the Agoran lists and completely forget about Agora and
never have any adverse effect as a result.
BobTHJ
