coppro wrote: > Ed Murphy wrote: >> coppro wrote: >> >>> Ed Murphy wrote: >>>> coppro wrote: >>>> >>>>> You should also feel HUMILIATED if you didn't vote in this >>>>> QUORUM-FAILING election! Especially if you missed the second, correct >>>>> announcement and so got your vote dropped! HUMILIATION! >>>> What was quorum for this election, and for the Tailor election, and >>>> why? Based on recent proposal resolutions, the baseline has been 6 >>>> lately, but there may have been rubberstamping or something that I >>>> haven't been paying attention to. >>>> >>> The eligible voters for an election are the active players; unlike >>> proposal Decisions, this set is not fixed at initiating time. As a >>> result, quorum is currently 6. >>> >>> There is currently no means to change quorum on an election. >> So how did you resolve quorum-failing elections? Did the extended >> voting periods already expire? >> > > No, I was providing the mandatory humiliating announcement; they were > resolved successfully.
What I mean is, if quorum was 6, and there were only 5 valid votes, then how did you successfully resolve with an outcome other than FAILED QUORUM (i.e. which of my assumptions is wrong)?
