Ed Murphy wrote: > I wrote: > >> coppro wrote: >> >>> Ed Murphy wrote: >>>> coppro wrote: >>>> >>>>> You should also feel HUMILIATED if you didn't vote in this >>>>> QUORUM-FAILING election! Especially if you missed the second, correct >>>>> announcement and so got your vote dropped! HUMILIATION! >>>> What was quorum for this election, and for the Tailor election, and >>>> why? Based on recent proposal resolutions, the baseline has been 6 >>>> lately, but there may have been rubberstamping or something that I >>>> haven't been paying attention to. >>>> >>> The eligible voters for an election are the active players; unlike >>> proposal Decisions, this set is not fixed at initiating time. As a >>> result, quorum is currently 6. >>> >>> There is currently no means to change quorum on an election. >> So how did you resolve quorum-failing elections? Did the extended >> voting periods already expire? > > Or, alternatively, was someone inactive long enough to drop quorum to > 5 while the elections were resolved? Oh, I see the misunderstanding. I didn't list PRESENT in the totals because it's not a valid option; there were still 6 votes.
-copopro
