2009/8/12 comex <com...@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Kerim Aydin<ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >> No offense taken, I'll be careful of the pattern. Though I'm not sure >> may was an error in the original (when it was a pragmatic "MAY publish" >> with no support issues - the pre-great-repeals legal system had a lot >> of Kelly-influenced "if you pragmatically publish it (which you can >> do naturally), it will be called a Notice, but it's an Invalid Notice >> if you do it wrong". So I think it is just an old style thing. > > I wasn't around for that. Hopefully the recent R2125 > > -- > -c. >
But when combined with a flux capacitator the paradox... well, let me show you, just a
