On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Kerim Aydin<ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > No offense taken, I'll be careful of the pattern. Though I'm not sure > may was an error in the original (when it was a pragmatic "MAY publish" > with no support issues - the pre-great-repeals legal system had a lot > of Kelly-influenced "if you pragmatically publish it (which you can > do naturally), it will be called a Notice, but it's an Invalid Notice > if you do it wrong". So I think it is just an old style thing.
I wasn't around for that. Hopefully the recent R2125 -- -c.
