On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:11, Roger Hicks<pidge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 18:24, Sean Hunt<ride...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I agree to the following:
>>
>> {{ This is a pledge named Bank. coppro CAN act on behalf of it or
>> perform arbitrary Contract Changes to it by announcement. }}
>>
>> I transfer all my Deck of Change cards to Bank.
>>
> Fails. Per R2253:
>
> Ownership of cards is restricted to players and
> contests.
>
>> I deputize for Anarchist to destroy my cards for the month of August; I
>> have no cards, so this is less than my ADL. The obligation is fulfilled.
>>
> I'm not entirely sure this is successful.
>
>> I deputize for Anarchist to destroy OscarMeyr's cards for the month of
>> August. I choose one of eir cards at random and destroy it to satisfy
>> eir ADL of 6:
>>
> Or this. The way R2259 is worded leads me to believe that hand limit
> enforcement must be done for all players in the same message. The
> dealor doesn't have a SHALL to perform it for each entity, but instead
> has a SHALL to perform it for all entities. The last line of R2259
> seems to support this as well.
>
> Thoughts?
>
Well, since no one commented I'm treating this as wholly ineffective.
CFJ if you believe otherwise.
BobTHJ
