On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 02:48 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote: > I play 3 Absolv-o-matic cards to destroy my three Rests > > I was going to hold off on this, but it seems to be a good day for > scammers, so let's go for it. > > I create 33 Local Election cards in my own possession. > > R2253 says: > > The dealer for a deck CAN, by announcement: > * create a card that is part of that deck in the possession of > any entity; > * destroy any card that is part of that deck; > * transfer a card that is part of that deck between any two > entities; > > however the e SHALL only perform these actions as explicitly > permitted by the Rules. E MAY transfer, play, or destroy cards > in eir own possession as any other player generally MAY. > > Note in particular the last sentence. It says I MAY award cards from my > basic deck as any player generally MAY. Any player MAY award any assets > to any other player by virtue of the default assumption that actions are > legal. However, other players CANNOT do this; this protects the game. I > CAN perform such awards, and I MAY do so because any other player > generally MAY.
No, it doesn't. It transfers legality for transfers, plays, and destructions of cards in your own possession; but unfortunately for you, not creations. If the last sentence included creations too, I think the scam would work. -- ais523
