On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:15, Kerim Aydin<ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > You used this to win the game in a direct breach of trust by performing > an officer's duty 33 times as explicitly forbidden. This is worth 33 NoVs > and removal from office IMO; it's the precise purpose of writing the > rules this way. What do others think? > Even if the scam worked I still think this warrants 33 NOVs (well, as many as can be supported) for violating the SHALL.
BobTHJ
