On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 16:34 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 4:23 PM, ais523<callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > Ineffective, CoEs have to be done publically, which is secured at power > > 3, and no sufficiently powerful rule lets you do that. > > I Say This Is The Correct Interpretation And Therefore It Is The > Correct Interpretation?
Nobody has argued for another interpretation of the rule in question, on this list or a-b, yet. Acting on behalf is secured, that's pretty obvious; the only contention is whether sending a message is acting on behalf of yourself, and game custom up to now, as well as common sense, and the precedent of CFJ 2077, says it is. Everyone suddenly seems to have changed their minds, though, now that's been used as part of a scam. -- ais523
