On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 18:04, Elliott Hird<penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > 2009/7/17 Roger Hicks <pidge...@gmail.com>: >> I didn't >> mess with the font-size (as ehird suggested) but the text-only version >> should compensate for this. > > Why not just... get the non-text one right? >
Because I'm really rather fond of the 10pt type. If that poses a problem you could always set your screen resolution to 640x480. Then it will be plenty big enough. BobTHJ
