> Waitaminute. Isn't there an existing precedent to the tune that "if a > priority of an office is undefined, we can use the natural sense of high > and low priority to define it" and further that by custom, any weekly > office was high priority? I don't see anything in the ruleset that > prevents a judge/precedent from deciding that an office is high or low > priority based on custom. Or is this just another thing that was > "decided" without a CFJ or question? -G.
Quite possibly. However, I don't know what the definition of high- or low- priority would be, exactly, and if someone provided a classification, I'd gladly use that.
