On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Geoffrey Spear<geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I resign as Promotor and Registrar. Someone who voted for the >> abortion that repealed officer salaries can take them. >> > > You do realize I have a proposal that will award back salaries. >
Waitaminute. Isn't there an existing precedent to the tune that "if a priority of an office is undefined, we can use the natural sense of high and low priority to define it" and further that by custom, any weekly office was high priority? I don't see anything in the ruleset that prevents a judge/precedent from deciding that an office is high or low priority based on custom. Or is this just another thing that was "decided" without a CFJ or question? -G.
