ais523 wrote: > On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 03:56 -0500, Benjamin Caplan wrote: >> I hereby request any and all persons to submit evidence and arguments, >> either publicly or by private email to me, that may be relevant to this >> case. In particular, I would be interested in hearing from H. Caller c., >> H. Notary ais523, and H. Wooble. > > Arguments, CFJ 2619: > > Per Rule 2173, I cannot legally reveal the text of private contracts > without consent from all parties, from the text of the contract itself, > or in connection with an equity case. This is an inquiry case. > > I will reveal any relevant private contracts on a joint request from all > of the parties of such a contract; but not otherwise.
Although you may not reveal the text or membership of private contracts, you may divulge their existence. How many private contracts are you currently aware of? (If the answer is four, I can infer FALSE, since according to the Notary wiki there are four publicly known private contracts, to none of which Wooble is party.)
