Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, comex wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Sean Hunt<ride...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I also intend, without objection (independently), to ratify the
>>> following (definitively) incorrect document:
>>>
>>> {
>>> The first paragraph of Rule 2256 reads as follows:
>
> Just in case, I object. This is not a true emergency even if the
> scam worked (which I don't believe), ratification of an untrue ruleset
> as opposed to legislation is for the direst of emergencies. -G.
Why do you believe it doesn't work?
