On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Craig Daniel wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Elliott > Hird<penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> 2009/6/30 Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu>: >>> Proposal 4432 by Maud, AI=1, Ordinary >>> Invisibilitating >>> >>> Be it resolved, that the proposer of an adopted proposal (besides this >>> proposal) including provisions that propose changes to parts of the >>> gamestate information about which is not subject to publication in >>> official >>> reports, with the exception of the publication of that proposal by the >>> Promotor and the Assessor, shall be guilty of the Class 0 Infraction of >>> Invisibilitating. >>> >>> [Beware! You may still be guilty of this!] >> >> wat? >> > > ...you know, that crime sounds really familiar to me. >
Guilty conscience? -G.