On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Craig Daniel wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Elliott
> Hird<penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> 2009/6/30 Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu>:
>>>    Proposal 4432 by Maud, AI=1, Ordinary
>>>    Invisibilitating
>>>
>>>    Be it resolved, that the proposer of an adopted proposal (besides this
>>>    proposal) including provisions that propose changes to parts of the
>>>    gamestate information about which is not subject to publication in 
>>> official
>>>    reports, with the exception of the publication of that proposal by the
>>>    Promotor and the Assessor, shall be guilty of the Class 0 Infraction of
>>>    Invisibilitating.
>>>
>>>    [Beware!  You may still be guilty of this!]
>>
>> wat?
>>
>
> ...you know, that crime sounds really familiar to me.
>
Guilty conscience?  -G.



Reply via email to