On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Elliott Hird<penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > 2009/6/30 Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu>: >> Proposal 4432 by Maud, AI=1, Ordinary >> Invisibilitating >> >> Be it resolved, that the proposer of an adopted proposal (besides this >> proposal) including provisions that propose changes to parts of the >> gamestate information about which is not subject to publication in >> official >> reports, with the exception of the publication of that proposal by the >> Promotor and the Assessor, shall be guilty of the Class 0 Infraction of >> Invisibilitating. >> >> [Beware! You may still be guilty of this!] > > > wat? >
...you know, that crime sounds really familiar to me.
