On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Ed Murphy<emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: > [Tiger is sitting, thus I cannot honor eir favoring without violating > the prohibition against assigning a poorly qualified judge. I could > wait for the next rotation, but at risk of violating the requirement > to assign a judge ASAP. Tiger, you may be able to talk allispaul into > transferring the case to you, see Rule 2164.] > > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2579 > > ============================== CFJ 2579 ============================== > > An election for the office of Anarchist was initiated on June > 11, 2009. > > ======================================================================== > > Caller: Rodlen > > Judge: allispaul > Judgement: > > ======================================================================== > > History: > > Called by Rodlen: 11 Jun 2009 18:23:57 GMT > Assigned to allispaul: (as of this message) > > ======================================================================== > > Caller's Evidence: > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Geoffrey Spear > <geoffsp...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Jonatan >> Kilhamn<jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > The election has been initiated, what happened now was that the voting >> > period started. >> >> I doubt it. > > ======================================================================== >
Since Tiger hasn't asked for this (and 2164 seems to say that he needs to provide the intent), I plan to judge it. Sorry, Tiger. I judge FALSE. On June 8, 2009, Taral initiated the election with zeckalpha's support. By R2154, players CAN only initiate elections for "a specified elected office for which no election is already in progress," and then only with support. Both of these conditions were fulfilled for Taral's initiation, and neither for Yally's. Now, anyone following the thread reasonably closely would understand that Yally as IADoP meant to initiate the Agoran decision to determine the Officeholder, but as "election" is defined unambiguously in the rules, the initiation of the decision failed.
