Alex Smith wrote: > On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 20:04 +0200, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: >> 2009/6/11 Rodlen <rodlenj...@gmail.com>: >> > I CFJ on the following: >> > "What is forced by rule 2029 to Dance a Powerful Dance?" >> Ye Marvy, of course. > > I call for judgement on the statement "A Powerful Dance is an > instrument.". > > Arguments: Powerful Dances are, by definition, powerful, therefore must > have power, therefore must be instruments. (I suspect that no Powerful > Dances exist, though, rules-wise, so this is unlikely to be a problem.)
Gratuitous: > Rule 1688/4 (Power=3) > Power > > The power of an entity is a non-negative rational number. > An instrument is an entity with positive power. If this said instead "An entity that is not an instrument CANNOT have positive power", then R2029 would simply take precedence over it by higher power. As it is, I concur with the caller's arguments.
