On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Roger Hicks wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 16:21, Jonatan Kilhamn<jonatan.kilh...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>> I like. I think it should be 2 elected + the Promotor. >>> >> Promotor + 1 prerogative + 1 elected? >> > That might work. > > My thought process behind making the board elected positions was to > allow experienced players that are truly interested in reviewing > proposals to fill the job (in my estimation a good panel lineup would > be Murphy, Goethe, ais523...though there are certainly others that > would do the job well). I wouldn't want it to be forced upon anyone.
I think the free market solution works better - if you need to pay for a proposal, you make it at least slightly worthwhile (this is from empirical evidence in the game 2001-2007). Right now the problem is Support is free (and consequence-free) so no one bothers to be discriminating - this is just proposal spam. The proposer should do at least an initial good job. I wouldn't want to be on a panel that has to sort through the junk, either. Right now, my solution is to turn up my spam filter - a blanket vote AGAINST all proposals because I can't be bothered to wade through the noise. -G.
