On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > 2009/6/9 Benjamin Caplan <celestialcognit...@gmail.com>: >> Kerim Aydin wrote: >>> holder of the office by announcement; the ADoP SHALL initiate an >>> election for the office asap after such an office change. >> >> IADoP not ADoP. Also, why SHALL? Make it "any player CAN by >> announcement"; that way, an election starts if and only if the >> appointment is in some way controversial.
Anyone CAN with support anyway. Requiring the IADoP is the same principle as having the IADoP starting elections when an office hasn't had an election for a while. (1) Saying that the IADoP SHALL do it helps the new person gain legitimacy and (2) if the IADoP starts an election, some candidates might jump in who wouldn't start an election just for themselves. This is Good for Democracy(tm). > What's so International about that ADoP guy anyway? Job title inflation. And there's at least two countries' residents involved in the game to my knowledge. -G.
