On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Elliott Hird <penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Activity is just for quorum. > On 2009-06-04, Kyle Marek-Spartz <zeckal...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote: >>> Maybe we should instead make quorum depend on the number of people who >>> actually voted last time round (like B used to), rather than messing >>> with inactivation? >> >> One can be active without voting. >> >> Kyle Marek-Spartz - KDØGTK >> >
No. One must be active for any number of things. Voting is just the most prominent.
