On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Elliott Hird <penguinoftheg...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hmm. I'm pretty sure I thought of this scam many moons ago; I seem to > recall discussing it with ais523.
My original objection (and I believe ais523's as well) was actually intended as a non-scam block of the obvious trivial win. When only 3 objections were received though, it would've been foolish to not make the bribes required to just get the trivial win myself.
