On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 18:39 -0400, comex wrote: > On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote: > > It would be a different issue if root were Insulator, I imagine; in that > > case it might have been ambiguous whether root or the L&FD got the > > resulting Rest. > > I don't believe the Insulator is allowed to create rests in the LFD's > possession.
Recordkeepors can create assets arbitrarily, but not choose who gets them. (I suspect this is a really old holdover from the old asset rules.) As a result, they're unowned assets and the LFD gets them. -- ais523
