On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote: > On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 07:25 -0700, Rodlen wrote: >> >> DARGH! >> >> Recognizing that there were six violations of the rule, therefore >> allowing a punishment for each, I opine AFFIRM. >> > Does the subject line or who's-assigned-to-what list give enough context > to determine which appeal this is about, I wonder?
Yes, by CFJ 2389.
