On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote:
> Now I'm missing something. I don't see anything in CFJ 2406 that says
> we assume a deputy "is" the officer for the purpose of fulfilling the
> obligation. I would have appealed something that says that, because, well,
> it's not in the rules.
Maybe I'm thinking of something else, but I think
Any player (a deputy) CAN perform an action as if e held a
particular office
is pretty clear. E performs the action as if e holds the office, so
we pretend e holds the office at that moment.
