On 3/26/09 2:12 PM, comex wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I initiate an equity case regarding the PerlNomic Partnership, the >> parties to which are Dvorak, RainerWasserfuhr, Wooble, ais523, comex, >> ihope. The state of affairs not envisioned by the contract was >> comex's willful use of the Partnership to distribute a proposal in eir >> own self interest which included a false statement of the proposal >> pool being empty. >> > Arguments: According to ais523, Wooble assumes that e is the only one > adding proposals to PerlNomic, and if a PerlNomic player records a > proposal, there is a good chance of its being distributed twice. The > PerlNomic metarules ( http://nomic.info/perlnomic/metarules.txt ) > explicitly mention taking advantage of bugs and loopholes. While my > distribution wasn't strictly a PN bug, I'd say that it's at least > somewhat envisioned by the metarules; nobody, however, envisioned that > one player would unilaterally take over the PNP's duties, rather than > their being performed collectively. In light of this, I think a > reasonably equitable resolution would have the PNP resign as Promotor > and nominate Wooble, who deserves the salary and can ensure that no > false statements about the proposal pool are made. > Gratituous: The PerlNomic Partnership does not incorporate the metarules explicitly, and it's hard to read it as incorporating the metarules implicitly except as governing the procedure for becoming or ceasing to be a PerlNomicite and determining what exactly is a mechanism of the PerlNomic game. The judge should therefore not consider the metarules as a major factor in eir decision on this case.
-woggle
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
