On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > I initiate an equity case regarding the PerlNomic Partnership, the > parties to which are Dvorak, RainerWasserfuhr, Wooble, ais523, comex, > ihope. The state of affairs not envisioned by the contract was > comex's willful use of the Partnership to distribute a proposal in eir > own self interest which included a false statement of the proposal > pool being empty.
Arguments: According to ais523, Wooble assumes that e is the only one adding proposals to PerlNomic, and if a PerlNomic player records a proposal, there is a good chance of its being distributed twice. The PerlNomic metarules ( http://nomic.info/perlnomic/metarules.txt ) explicitly mention taking advantage of bugs and loopholes. While my distribution wasn't strictly a PN bug, I'd say that it's at least somewhat envisioned by the metarules; nobody, however, envisioned that one player would unilaterally take over the PNP's duties, rather than their being performed collectively. In light of this, I think a reasonably equitable resolution would have the PNP resign as Promotor and nominate Wooble, who deserves the salary and can ensure that no false statements about the proposal pool are made.
