On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Sean Hunt <ride...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ed Murphy wrote:
>> CFJ: Proposal 6122 has taken effect.
>>
>> Caller's arguments: Per Rule 2034(c) as amended by Proposal 6139, the
>> resolution of Proposals 6121 through 6139 constituted a self-ratifying
>> claim that Proposal 6122 has not been prevented from taking effect.
Gratuitous: So this was an intentional loophole too? I'm getting
tired of them, much more fun to exploit the unintentional sort.
Rule 106 reads:
If the option selected by Agora on this decision is ADOPTED,
then the proposal is adopted, and unless other rules prevent it
from taking effect, its power is set to the minimum of four and
its adoption index, and then it takes effect. It does not
otherwise take effect.
This clearly separates the increase of power and the actual taking of
effect. Even if the failed proposal took effect, its power was zero,
so it was not an instrument; therefore, Rule 105's
Where permitted by other rules, an instrument generally can,
as part of its effect,
does not apply, and
This rule provides the only mechanism by which rules can be
created, modified, or destroyed, or by which an entity can
become a rule or cease to be a rule.
does. The proposal took effect but was unauthorized to make any Rule
Changes so did nothing.
