2009/3/18 Geoffrey Spear <geoffsp...@gmail.com>: > I see no reason to leave an office, especially one with a weekly duty, > vacant for any longer than necessary. In fact, I'm not sure there's a > good reason not to require the IADoP to nominate as soon as possible > for all vacant offices rather than just high-priority ones. > > It also seems fairly unlikely the Anarchist will be given more duties. > Unless we adopt an RPG type framework, in which case e should be > responsible for throwing bombs at random officers to destabilize the > bureaucracy. > Oh, very well.
And I do realize that it's unlikely, but I felt I couldn't write "the only thing that would actually change" and then not include it. But that scenario... If it happened, I'd like to keep being the Anarchist.