On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >> 6155 O 1 1.0 comex Refactor falsity > 8xAGAINST. Isn't this duplicated in "misleading"? (Open to voting FOR > if I'm missing something).
This would criminalize even accidentally incorrect information if published as part of an officer's duties, as opposed to just intentionally incorrect information as in 2215. However, I'm not sure this would work with the UNAWARE criterion for NOT GUILTY remaining in the rules.
