On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 12:46 +0000, Alex Smith wrote: > On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 20:06 -0800, Taral wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > ais523's "fix" is not to be trusted. Read it. "If a rule mentions > > > the possibility... that someone can modify the rules by announcement, > > > then someone can modify the rules by announcement." If it passes, > > > whether or not mine succeeds, it mentions itself, and the first person > > > who gets the chance can trigger it. -G. > > > > Hence why I said repeal, not amend. :) > > I didn't notice that, good catch (although it's questionable whether it > would work or not anyway). > > I retract my proposal "Open It Up". > > I submit the following fixed version (titled "Open It Up", with an AI of > 3): > This obviously fails, I accidentally hit send too early.
-- ais523
