On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote: > 2009/3/3 Taral <tar...@gmail.com>: >> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote: >>> Voting for this one could be useful insurance against whatever Goethe is >>> trying. We already have H. Cassandra Goethe, don't make me a Cassandra >>> too... >> >> Change amend to repeal, and I'll vote for it. >> > > Me too. What was the amend thing about anyway? As far as I see, the > only thing that would happen if we voted it through, is that it > wouldn't be Goethe that performed the arbitrary rule change to the > rule, but rather the first player to react when it passed. If Goethe > could get a win through is rule, then any player could just as easily > do it with that one. Or have I got this wrong?
Ah well ais523, they've seen through our little "build the actual scam into the scam fix" thing. -G.
