-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Benjamin Caplan wrote: >> 1) Without N Objections: >> defaults N=1 and D=4 >> minimums N>=1 and D>=4 > > Works reasonably well, though we should probably say that N and D are > numbers so we don't decide that they're llamas or something. :)
They're prevented from spuriously becoming llamas by the same mechanism that prevents them from spuriously becoming unanimity: the defaults are secured at power 1, which effectively requires a proposal to override. Also, unless you can persuade a judge that a llama is >=1, their numberhood is arguably secured at power 3 due to minimums. Pavitra>=1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJqF2KyUdQDqgQe30RAraXAJ9C6y+rmPsRcWiWhXB8xAtdy5qRXgCeIpCL nZed8jWQAoBh2O3oiY9yJb0= =m65s -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
