On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Alex Smith wrote: > On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 09:56 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Alex Smith wrote: >>> I intend, without two objections, to create a Medal (as defined by the >>> rule which will be created by my Champion's Contests proposal if it >>> passes) in the possession of Enigma. >> >> I Object. If you're introducing a new way of winning, wait and do >> it cleanly if you want my vote/support/lack of objections. -G. >> > Ah, OK. It's not often a proposal introduces a new dependent action to > test on, though. Maybe we should test on a democratisation instead, but > it would have to be worded very carefully.
Fair enough. If you pledge to (assuming the proposal passes) attempt to create the medal based on this intent, call the CFJ, then re-start the intent and create the medal again 4 days later, and not try to award it in the meantime, I'll withdraw my objection :). -G.
