On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > Given that if e'd put the rule in, we would have accused em of trying > to ratify a scam or something, I'd say all these fall into "dammed if > e does, dammed if e doesn't", in other words, R1504(e). -G.
The Ruleset doesn't self-ratify and can't be ratified without Objection. Adding a rule (possibly with a "disputed" disclaimer) wouldn't violate the rules.
