ais523 wrote: > On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 08:47 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote: >> I support both of these. I, for one, think that any alleged ambiguity >> in the state of the rules should be reported prominently (possibly by >> adding a separate include-file directive to the top of the code that >> auto-generates the Logical Rulesets). > > Technically speaking, that isn't information that improves the > readability of the SLR; wouldn't it therefore violate a strong > encouragement in rule 1681?
Definitely not if the Rulekeepor thinks about it first.
