On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 2:52 AM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote: >> On or about Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:28:36 +0000, a rule was created >> or amended to contain the text "comex and ais523 were here".
I'm not doing this, because the win is fine and all, but since we're talking about invoking deregistration rights, a rights question: What would happen if I announced "I don't consider myself bound by this particular amendment to the rules, because I didn't have a reasonable opportunity to review it."? Any legal consequences? Context: 101(iv) was written to prevent just this sort of insta-adoption of last-minute text into the ruleset, should we bring that back if it isn't there now? -G.
