On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffsp...@gmail.com> wrote: > CFJ2376 established that the text of Proposal 6072 was changed to a > form that would insert the required language in R2238; the only
Looking back over the history, it appears that the reference to R2238 might be a factual error; as far as I can tell comex caused 2238 to repeal itself before P6072 took effect, which would mean that a new rule was created rather than 2238 being amended. I don't think this changes the substance of the ruling, however.
