Goethe wrote: > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >>> I move to REMAND 2356a. It should be overturned based on the Defendant's >>> arguments (to which the Judge agrees) but it's unfair to punish the >>> judge when the Defendant did not provide eir argument in a timely >>> manner. -Goethe >> I made the argument in the message contesting the original NoV, but >> I'm not sure whether that should have been part of the case record; I >> agree it's probably not all that reasonable to expect the judge to dig >> it up. > > Fair enough... it was meant to be a *very* mild rebuke anyway - the current > system does seem rather prone to losing arguments at different times.
If you quote the original NoV and arguments, I'll generally include them. If not, then ping me (watch for the assignment message).
