On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: >> >> I move to REMAND 2356a. It should be overturned based on the Defendant's >> arguments (to which the Judge agrees) but it's unfair to punish the >> judge when the Defendant did not provide eir argument in a timely >> manner. -Goethe > > I made the argument in the message contesting the original NoV, but > I'm not sure whether that should have been part of the case record; I > agree it's probably not all that reasonable to expect the judge to dig > it up.
Fair enough... it was meant to be a *very* mild rebuke anyway - the current system does seem rather prone to losing arguments at different times. -Goethe
